Wednesday, July 27, 2005
Advice to Potential Job Applicants . . .
Having gone through many searches over the last few years, I’ve developed a list of hints for job candidates (both faculty and administrative). If they seem obvious, you’re in good shape. If they don’t, PLEASE print them out, keep them, use them.
Proofread! There is simply no excuse for typos, poor grammar, or geographical howlers in a cover letter. (At my old school, also in the Northeast, we had a candidate who declared in the second paragraph of his cover letter that he never applies to schools in the Northeast. That was the end of that.) I’ve seen far too many Ph.D.’s send letters that look like they were written by distracted high schoolers.
Respond quickly. We are sometimes up against external deadlines of our own, and I’ve seen otherwise-viable candidates get rejected simply because they missed the window. (Corrolary: never, never, never take seriously the announced deadline. Always beat it by a wide margin. For reasons I’ll never understand, I’ve seen far too many committees jump the gun and simply lose patience with applications that arrive at the last minute.)
Don’t cop an attitude at the interview. You may, in your heart of hearts, think that my college is beneath you. I don’t, and the professors here don’t, either. We will not be intimidated. If you think you’re doing us a favor, don’t do us any favors.
Check the college website! If you couldn’t be bothered to do a little preliminary scoping, I get the message that you aren’t serious about working here. Ask questions that show that you’ve done your homework.
Don’t trash your previous employer. Even if everything you say is true (and it may well be), we’ll wonder if it just reflects a hyper-critical or high-maintenance personality. Even if you’re escaping a sinking ship, make clear that the attraction to the new position consists of more than ‘it’s not the old position.’
Keep it mind that, appearances notwithstanding, it’s not all about you. I’ve had interviews with intelligent, accomplished, charming, winsome candidates I couldn’t hire. At the end of the day, it’s about what the institution needs. If that’s you, great. If not, it’s not usually because of anything you could control. (Exceptions: if you commit the gaffes above. The cover letter gaffe will prevent you from even getting to the interview stage.)
Good luck!"
DITTO (from a non-administrative type!)
Tuesday, July 26, 2005
To My Students . . .
Here's what I wish my students knew. (And most of them do; it's the few who don't that really stand out for me.)
Going to college is a privilege, not a right.
While you are paying for my services, this does not mean that I should cater to you. Because you are paying me to teach you, you are implying that I have knowledge that you need. This means that I am probably intelligent enough to devise a course that will enable you to gain sufficient mastery of the material (if you try). This also means that all of the assignments I give you have a purpose. You should take the time to do the assignments, and do them properly. Oh, and coming to class? You should probably try it.
My job is not only to help you learn the course material, but also to prepare you for life. In the real world, most employers will not accept tardiness, late assignments, or excuses. I do not either. Your grades should be earned, not given to you."
The rest is even better . . .
Saturday, July 23, 2005
Dr. History: Co-Authored Articles
I've always been highly skeptical of co-authored articles in the sciences, business, and education. People in these schools continually claim that a co-authored article should count the same as an article with only one author when it comes to making tenure or promotions decisions. Can you really tell me that eight people working together on one 20 page article are doing the same amount of work as one person in the humanities who produces a single authored 20 page article? I really doubt it.
As I sweat away on this summer's article, I ran across this wonderful cartoon about co-authored articles in the sciences. It confirms all my suspicions. Now I must find a way to get this into the Provost's hands without him knowing it came from me.
The real meaning behind the co-authorship list. Posted by Hello"
Eduwonk.com: NCLB Drinking Game
As promised, here is a list of 24 jargony words to drink by. Special thanks to all of those who played along, and to all those who will hoist a few henceforth. The rules are simple: Each time you hear one of these often-used words from the education world, take a swig of whatever makes you happy. If you have no beverage (as often happens when these words come up) feel free to giggle, as long as you promise to do it in a manner that is completely condescending to those around you!
1. Rubric (Just try not to laugh the next time you hear it!)
2. Paradigm
3. Time-on-task
4. Incentivize
5. Dead white guys
6. Scaffold (as a verb)
7. Authentic learning
8. Differentiated instruction
9. Integrated learning
10. Constructivist
11. Balanced literacy
12. Highly qualified
13. Standards-based
14. Performance-based
15. Research-based
16. Scientifically-based
17. Self-directed learning (Sounds too much like something that causes hair to grow on palms.)
18. Developmentally-appropriate
19. Capacity building
20. Best practices (Mandatory group hugs, however, around anyone who uses the vernacular 'stuff that works pretty good.')
21. Higher order thinking (I had a roommate in college who was really into higher order thinking. He is no longer able to produce children.)
22. Collaborate (Not unless pastries are served.)
23. Transparency (It doesn't really exist.)
24. Train wreck (When used to describe standards movement/NCLB, etc. )
-- Joe Williams"
Friday, July 22, 2005
Smithsonian Institution Archives
Wednesday, July 20, 2005
France - Terror Alert Levels
AP and UPI reported that the French government announced yesterday that it has raised its terror alert level from "Run" to "Hide."
The only two higher levels in France are "Surrender" and "Collaborate."
The rise was precipitated by a recent fire which destroyed France's white flag factory, effectively paralyzing their military.
Tuesday, July 19, 2005
What Book Are You?
You're A People's History of the United States!
by Howard Zinn
After years of listening to other peoples' lies, you decided you've
had enough. Now you're out to tell it like it is, with all the gory details and nothing
left out. Instead of respecting leaders, you want to know what the common people have to
offer. But this revolution still has a long way to go, and you're not against making a
little profit while you wait. Honesty is your best policy.
Take the Book Quiz
at the Blue Pyramid.
Sunday, July 17, 2005
Great week with grant project
We're off to the National Archives in City for the next 3 days.
Wednesday, July 13, 2005
The Washington Monthly - more on the CHE blogging article
Was Professor Turbo Geek just a computer hobbyist? Or did PTG reveal that a typical day included 14 hours a day coding HTML followed by exclamations like 'Christ, I wish I never had to read another Victorian poem again'?
Did Professor Shrill just vent about daily life? Or are we talking about dark and detailed confessions of homicidal urges aimed at close colleagues?
As for Bagged Cat, I'd venture to say that by boasting to a blogger about his illicit puffery, he failed not just the integrity test for a faculty position, but the IQ test as well."
coffee grounds: Should you blog?
Savage Minds: Notes and Queries in Anthropology — A Group Blog ? Blogs and the Job Search: The passion, the shame, the irony
Tuesday, July 12, 2005
Tightly Wound comments on academic blogging
In other words, if you wanna be an academic, you'd better shut your mouth and get on the reservation, baby. No freedom of expression for you!
Unless you blog anonymously. And for the love of God, don't put your web address on your resume."
Monday, July 11, 2005
Jim the Weather Stud!
it gets even better - academic blogging
Yet more on the anti-blogger
Following that logic, of course, job seekers (and holders) should also avoid use of the telephone, the word processor, email, and their own voice, since these could also be used for nefarious purposes. Indeed, best not to form any human attachments whatsoever, since, in the logic of the piece in the Chronicle, they might lead to non-peer-reviewed activities."
Project eHIKES Summer Institute 2005
xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word"
xmlns:st1="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
National Archives Resources for Today’s Topics
Project eHIKES
1. Digital Classroom
Since we’re centering on the constitution and most materials
are related to the federal government, many lesson plans in the Digital
Classroom fall under this topic. The following are also African American sites:
http://www.archives.gov/digital_classroom
Notice the two cases in the spotlight today:
Frontiers in
Civil Rights: The Dorothy Davis Case
The 1964
Civil Rights Case
Now click on Teaching with Documents:
The Amistad Case
Fugitive from Labor Cases: Henry Garnett
(1850) and Moses Honner (1860)
The Fight for Equal Rights: Blacks in the Civil War
Letters,
Telegrams, and Photographs Illustrating Factors that Affected the Civil War
Photographs of
the 369th Infantry and African Americans During
World War I
style='mso-bidi-font-style:normal'>Documents Related to Brown v. Board of
Education
Jackie
Robinson: Beyond the Playing Field
The Many Face
of Paul Robeson
Court Documents
Related to Martin Luther King, Jr., and
Sanitation Workers
The Civil
Rights Act and the Equal Employment
Commission
2. Using ARC
African American Political Leadership
class=GramE>individual names (Booker T. Washington, W.E.B. class=SpellE>DuBois, A. Philip Randolph, Marcus Garvey)
NAACP
Searching for Slavery vs. Slave (why?)
Mid-Atlantic
Region –
Slave Cases
Civil Rights – why would this term appear so often?
Citing Electronic Records in the National Archives:
Sunday, July 10, 2005
Continued comments on academic blogging
Saturday, July 09, 2005
HaloScan.com - Comments
What happens in the university, stays in the university. It's a sort of a feudal mafia."
another great comment!
One Man's Opinion?-?Everyone's Got One!
Stop and think about that. The ramifications of an idiotic post outweigh the ramifications of faulty teaching. "
more interesting comments
Bitch. Ph.D.: This right here is why I don't blog under my real name
Shorter Chronicle of Higher Ed: blogging is dangerous because hiring committees are paranoid, conservative, and illogical. Even if you are not indiscreet on your blog, you could become so--but if you don't have a blog, you couldn't possibly start one and therefore never be indiscreet.* Publishing pseudonymous articles about your search committee deliberations in the Chronicle of Higher Ed, though, is not indiscreet.
Also, we don't want to work with people who get frustrated by traffic or who are in any way anxious or neurotic because of course we are all paragons of mental health, and it isn't in any way discriminatory to decide not to hire someone because you think they need therapy."
more great discussion of this article
Playing School, Irreverently: Well, I probably wouldn't want to work there, anyway.
My first reaction to reading the Chronicle article dribble by Tribble yesterday morning, before even seeing all of the discussion that has popped up around it, was 'Well, I probably wouldn't want to work there, anyway.'"
This is a great response by profgrrrrl to the CHE article with los of thoughtful commentary and links to others who also discussed the issue.
Friday, July 08, 2005
Bloggers and Academe
By IVAN TRIBBLE
First Person
Personal experiences on the job market
What is it with job seekers who also write blogs? Our recent faculty search at Quaint Old College resulted in a number of bloggers among our semifinalists. Those candidates looked good enough on paper to merit a phone interview, after which they were still being seriously considered for an on-campus interview.
That's when the committee took a look at their online activity.
In some cases, a Google search of the candidate's name turned up his or her blog. Other candidates told us about their Web site, even making sure we had the URL so we wouldn't fail to find it. In one case, a candidate had mentioned it in the cover letter. We felt compelled to follow up in each of those instances, and it turned out to be every bit as eye-opening as a train wreck.
Don't get me wrong: Our initial thoughts about blogs were, if anything, positive. It was easy to imagine creative academics carrying their scholarly activity outside the classroom and the narrow audience of print publications into a new venue, one more widely available to the public and a tech-savvy student audience.
We wanted to hire somebody in our stack of finalists, so we gave the same -- or more -- benefit of the doubt to the bloggers as to the others in the pool.
A candidate's blog is more accessible to the search committee than most forms of scholarly output. It can be hard to lay your hands on an obscure journal or book chapter, but the applicant's blog comes up on any computer. Several members of our search committee found the sheer volume of blog entries daunting enough to quit after reading a few. Others persisted into what turned out, in some cases, to be the dank, dark depths of the blogger's tormented soul; in other cases, the far limits of techno-geekdom; and in one case, a cat better off left in the bag.
The pertinent question for bloggers is simply, Why? What is the purpose of broadcasting one's unfiltered thoughts to the whole wired world? It's not hard to imagine legitimate, constructive applications for such a forum. But it's also not hard to find examples of the worst kinds of uses.
A blog easily becomes a therapeutic outlet, a place to vent petty gripes and frustrations stemming from congested traffic, rude sales clerks, or unpleasant national news. It becomes an open diary or confessional booth, where inward thoughts are publicly aired.
Worst of all, for professional academics, it's a publishing medium with no vetting process, no review board, and no editor. The author is the sole judge of what constitutes publishable material, and the medium allows for instantaneous distribution. After wrapping up a juicy rant at 3 a.m., it only takes a few clicks to put it into global circulation."
====================
I'll be interested to see what other academic bloggers think of this.
Wednesday, July 06, 2005
ScrappleFace: Bush: U.S.-Mexico 'Border' Renamed 'Junction'
June 30, 2005
Bush: U.S.-Mexico 'Border' Renamed 'Junction'
by Scott Ott
(2005-06-30) -- In an effort to reframe the national security debate in a way that could placate critics within his own party, President George Bush today announced that the U.S.-Mexico border has been renamed the 'U.S.-Mexico junction'.
The executive order changing the terminology follows the president's meeting with linguistic consultant George Lakoff, who recently helped the Democrat party realize that Americans don't oppose their liberal ideology, just the words they use to talk about key issues.
'Folks get concerned when illegal aliens, of unknown origin and motivations pour across the border by the thousands each day,' said Mr. Bush. 'But I now understand that the real issue is the word 'border' itself. It's so forbidding and sounds like a barrier rather than place of coming together.'
The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) immediately hired a consultant from Wal-Mart to retrain border guards for their new junction function, which closely mirrors the role of a Wal-Mart 'People Greeter'.
'There's a security element to the job,' the president said. 'But for the most part, it's about making folks feel welcome in our free and open society, and not discriminating against those who violate our laws. After all, most of them have never been arrested or convicted, and in America you're innocent until proven guilty.'"
------------
I especially like the part about the Wal-mart greeters . . .
Monday, July 04, 2005
Tightly Wound: Exclusive!
Today we have an exclusive--an insight into the inner workings of academe as it pertains to handling unfortunately outspoken members of the professoriate. Yes, I have managed to get my hands on a series of memos from Colorado that discuss the latest wackiness from everyone's 'favorite' 'Native American' 'professor,' Ward Churchill. Read and be enlightened...
"
Definitely a good read - just follow the link.
Saturday, July 02, 2005
The Morning Sun: 'It was a symbol of faith' 07/02/05
photo: local
Stephanie Farley/The Morning Sun
St. Francis Catholic Church's steeple was not where it should be when residents woke up on Friday morning. Instead of serving as the beacon of St. Paul's community, the steeple lay strewn about in pieces on the ground after it was severely damaged in Thursday night's series of storms that ripped through southeast Kansas. Neosho County Sheriff James Keath said that while the majority of damage was caused by straight-lined winds, some of the damage could have been caused by possible tornadic activity.
'It was a symbol of faith'
Winds bring down St. Francis Church steeple
By STEPHANIE FARLEY
Morning Sun Staff Writer
Pam Strong could see it every morning as she drove to Macs Git-N-Split convenience store where she works as a cashier. It was her light.
It would calm her down whenever she came into work in a bad mood.
'It was a symbol of faith,' she said. 'It was like someone saying, 'It'll be all right. It'll be all right.''"
Friday, July 01, 2005
tornadoes in Kansas - too close for comfort
By: Brad Ketcham
Strong Tornadoes cause damage in southern Neosho County
A strong upper level low pressure system moved east across Nebraska on Thursday. Meanwhile, a surface low pressure was centered over northeast Kansas and deepened during the afternoon. As the surface low deepened, a dryline surged east across the state and reached southeast Kansas by late afternoon. Thunderstorms developed rapidly around 5pm over Neosho and Labette counties, as the dryline pushed into a very unstable airmass sitting over the area. The thunderstorms transitioned into the classic Supercell type storms shortly thereafter, producing large hail and the rare weather phenomenon (tornadoes). See Image 1 and Image 2 for reflectivity and velocity data from the KINX radar site in Tulsa, OK.
Image 3 is an picture of the overshooting top from the supercell in Neosho county. This usually indicates very intense updraft strength with-in thunderstorms.
A tornado damage assessment team from NOAA's National Weather Service office out of Wichita, Kansas went to Neosho County to assess the strength of the tornadoes that touched down in that area. They found evidence of 2 separate tornadoes touching down. Specifics on each tornado are listed below: See Image 4 for Tornado tracks in Neosho county.
Tornado #1: The tornado first touched down just a few miles south of Galesburg or just north of Parson's Lake in Neosho county, and remained on the ground for 5 miles. See Image 5. The tornado gained strength as it moved east and severely damaged a house. The tornado was rated F3(158-206mph) on the Fujita scale ( Image 6)( Image 7). The tornado lifted about a mile west of highway 59.
Tornado #2: The supercell continued to move east and spwaned a second tornado about 4 miles south of St. Paul in Neosho county. The tornado remained on the ground for about 7 miles as it tracked northeast. A barn was destroyed along with some tree damage. The tornado reached F1(73- 112mph) status on the Fujita scale.
Tornado #3: A weak F0(less than 73mph) tornado touched down 8 miles east of Parsons in northeast Labette county at U.S. Highway 400 and York Rd. No damaged occured with this brief touch down.
More images of damage from the tornadoes.
Image 8
Image 9
Image 10
Image 11
This story was brought to you by the National Weather Service - Wichita KS"
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]